Does OOL research need a disclaimer?

He defintely didnt sit around saying there are some unknown “laws” to explain this.

He made testable hypothesis and tested it. That’s science.

Thats not the case here and you are diverting.
Tell me, how can speculation about still to be found laws and the probability of unknown miracles be called Science?
Even the claims of the multiverse is better than this. Atleast there is a solid proposal
eve though untestable with some math.