@Armen_Danielyan, we are very informed about ID arguments. Just reiterating them isn’t going to get you very far. I’d rather we didn’t. Instead our goal is to seek understanding. In this case, you might benefit from learning why we reject ID arguments.
In this case, key premises are trivially false.
That isn’t a fact. It is a false. Very commonly apparently non-intelligent causes produce coded information. One such example is the evolution of cancer: Cancer and Evolution
If that premise is false, and it is, nothing else follows. Perhaps life is designed, but we can know with certainty that this argument (and any argument dependent on that premise) is an invalid argument for design.