Drs. Sanford and Carter respond to PS Scientists

[Rumraket (Mikkel R.)]

@PDPrice

That’s simply false. You did assert it, but at no point have you given any explanation (even when directly asked) as to why very small changes to a machine would not adhere to the same general principle of “easier to break than to improve”. This was, in fact, what you acknowledged as the reason why the distribution is uneven.

That is an egregious falsehood. I seem to recall a lengthy attempt by @glipsnort to get you to wrap your head around an analogy using printers that use toner to print pages.