Evidence for the Flood

Yes it is, mostly. Now this gets into “creation science”, which is to real science as Malibu Barbie’s Dream House is to a real house. But you’re going to have to decide where in the geological record the flood ends, and then you’re going to have to decide what causes whatever rocks you think are post-flood. Let me know when you figure out when the Eocene happened.

But even given all that, why should all archeological evidence be post-flood? After all, Cain built a city long before the flood. Why is there no archeological or paleontological evidence of pre-flood humans? Seems like a hole in your scenario.

There are no kinds, no creation, no flood. Your bible fantasy keeps you from learning anything; it keeps you from wanting to learn anything; it keeps you wanting never to learn anything.

5 Likes