Neither am I.
The revealing thing will be whether @Giltil changes his mind after they release yet another stream of irrelevant gobbledygook. What typically happens in these situations:
Denialist makes dumb argument or claim.
People who have a clue explain in painstaking detail why the claim is dumb.
Denialist says a bunch of stuff that does not address any of the issues raised about his claim, but just continues to insist he is right.
Followers of the denialist respond “Well, there is still a debate going on. He might be right. We should keep an open mind and not censor dissenting views.”
@Giltil has already gone thru above cycle once. Let’s see if he breaks out of it…