No. I don’t have an “MYH7 argument,” Bill. I simply point to the MYH7 evidence and ask whether your ID hypothesis explains it. You haven’t done this.
You see, a viable scientific hypothesis not only has to make empirical predictions, it must be consistent with all of the extant data. You don’t really have any ID hypothesis, do you?
@sfmatheson: this is an example of the context of my objections to the indiscriminate use of “argument” in real science.
What does it have to do with it, exactly? The hundreds of alleles are not fixed! The polymorphism of MYH7 shows why Behe has shown nothing but simplistic twaddle intelligently designed to fool YOU.
How so, exactly? Be sure to make extensive use of the term “epistasis” in your explanation.