Wrong right off the bat. It’s just a hypothesis, not a theory.
Nope.
…is that you are pontificating based on hearsay without knowing very much.
Everything you’ve written here suggests that you never looked at a single datum before making grand pronouncements that cite “the data.”
I’ll ask again: how much of the actual data have you examined for yourself?
That is objectively false. A full exploration would have necessarily included addressing the strongest evidence for it: the fact that peptidyltransferase, the core of the ribosome, is a ribozyme.
No reader of Meyer’s book is informed of this Nobel Prize-winning fact.
So, on what evidentiary basis did you judge the exploration to be a full one?