@Faizal_Ali, this is an interesting comment from you:
In an odd sense, it could be argued that Swamidass actually shows less respect and deference to science than does a Young Earth Creationist like Ken Ham or an Intelligent Design Creationist like Michael Behe (Though, I hasten to add, in every other respect his understanding and acceptance of science far exceeds theirs).
It sounds like you are trying describe the situation. Perhaps you mean this.
-
YEC and ID are committed to finding and claiming positive evidence for their beliefs, often with the tacit assumption that “if it happened, there is positive evidence for it.”
-
Swamidass is content to show nothing out rules his scenario, and is not putting forward positive evidence forward for the de novo creation of AE.
Is that what you are pointing too?