My logic still stands firm.
0+0= no creation
God + nothing = Any creation he wants.
How can a mindless universe create something? If it could, a pretty young girl could appear in my room from nowhere. Unfortunately, that ain’t gonna happen. Isn’t logic fun to consider? Oh, my friend, something had to begin the Big Bang; otherwise, there would have been nothing. How is the universe going to expand if there is nothing to create it? Remember that pretty young lady I mentioned. If there is nothing to create it, how does nothing create the radiation. What not that mean that the radiation or whatever must have a mind to create.
Infinite Mind + 0 = Creation of whatever it wants. If there is nothing, how can there be radiation. No, I am correct. How can there be Quantum Mechanics if there is nothing to create it. If this universe cannot be created because there is nothing, then how can there be a multiverse and how can that babe be there? My formula still stands firm. And if there were multiverses without a mind to call it into being, how do we know that that girl is not ugly in that multiverse? No, my friend, there must be a infinite mind that has always been to create what we see and perhaps don’t see. Even though Herr Dr. Krauss attempts to create a universe without a creator, how is that possible when there is no intelligent mind to begin it. Nothing + nothing still equals nothing. We must remember that the human mind is not capable of understanding everything. If it could, then we would be the creators. If the human mind were infinite, then we would know all and see all. We would even be able to see if there are other beings in the fourth or fifth dimensions. I am getting tired now and am having a lot of pain in my bones. I must take a rest. We can perhaps continue tomorrow. Good friends and God bless both of you. Oh, one last word from me. How can Herr Dr. Krauss know if his hypotheses are try. The human mind is an animal brain. Am I not right? A mortal brain can’t possibly know everything. Good night. Interesting discussions. Oh, doesn’t Richard Dawkins have an animal brain too? That means his ideas could be wrong.
Oh, but my friend, there is something. There is God, and he made something out of nothing. Nothing + Nothing still makes lifeless, mindless, loveless nothing.
This is not total nonsense what I have written here. Neither is what I wrote about the human brain. You are the one who believes that we have evolved from lower animals. If we did, then our brains are animal brains too. You worship regular men like Charles Darwin and Francis Collins. I do not. I worship the creator of the universe who has lived from everlasting to everlasting. 0+0 = nothing. God + 0 = creation and life. I know who you are now. You were on Biologos and used the same arguments there. Your arguments do not make sense. Oh, there are many things that the human mind can’t understand. If that is not true, why can’t scientists heal cancer in all cases? Why can scientists not send someone back into the past or into the future? What is time itself? Why can’t you remember the day you were born? Why can’t you understand why 0+0 = 0. Why do you think that Francis Collins knows everything? If you believe he does, why don’t you accept the reality of an infinite creator? Yet you worship Collins as if he were a god. Hugh Ross is an intelligent man; however, he doesn’t know everything and I do not worship him.