No. That was just word salad. A separate creation hypothesis (of one sort) doesn’t create a star. It predicts a star. Since we don’t see a star phylogeny, that hypothesis is wrong. This isn’t about my interpretation. It’s about what we would expect if the hypothesis were true. Now, if by “comparatice gene data” you refer to the presence/absence of orthologs, yes, the hypothesis would predict that new genes and gene losses would not show a nested hierarchy. But of course they do, so the hypothesis is again falsified. You still haven’t provided your hypothesis.
2 Likes