You seem to agree that morality cannot exist without a mind.
If God exists, everything arose from His mind. The purpose of creation emanates from Him. This includes your life’s purpose and mine. You and I exist because and for Him. Hence His morality is our standard.
You could choose to disagree with God. You could insist that your moral opinions are superior to God’s God’s judgements. You could reject God’s purpose for your life… In that case, you would have to sustain yourself and cause yourself to exist. In the christian understanding of things, this is not possible. So there is a moral obligation to fulfill Gods expectation.
Not quite. Morality is the product of human instinct and thought.
Sorry, but that just doesn’t follow.
I certainly insist that genocide is wrong, and that when God commits genocide he’s done something wrong. You disagree?
None of those sentences go together to make any sort of support for your conclusion, and they’re full of unsupported premises. Some of them are just plain incoherent. How would rejecting God’s purpose, whatever that may be, make me cause myself to exist? How is rejecting God’s purpose impossible, when you just said I could do it? How does any of that relate to a moral obligation?
Ok, I want to understand where you are coming from here.
How do you define morality which exists in God?
Didnt get you there.
I suppose you were trying to say something sarcastic/humorous.
Do you think such jokes could be a crime… or perhaps a sin? (No one understands them, and they are probably not funny).
What it means is that you are asking questions of the form “Aren’t you an idiot?”, questions that assume a particular answer and imply particular assertions to be true.
I was pointing out that you could not define morality as something that applies to God… but still insist your understanding of morality is not “athiestic”.
