ID made it obvious that Evolutionists will always assume anything that any that exists, ultimately arose by either random chance or through the variableness of a poorly defined system. No matter what. And whoever disagrees has to prove that it can’t happen. Evolutionists today are more likely now to just come right out and actually admit this on their own!
Anyone who cares, can easily recognize this pattern now. So ID has served it’s purpose. It was meant to decline. Though I am a creationist, I have never consider myself to be an IDer, because I knew the evolutionists response to ID would be predictable. And it was. Of course Günter Bechly would also have known how the evolutionists would respond to ID. Any secularist theory of origins always relies on the variableness of one system to allow for something new to happen and thus a new system is formed. From stellar evolution all the way to eyesight. With very little explanation of how one system actually evolves another. No evolutionist on this forum would even dare to try to explain how a mechanical system could evolve a visual system. They would just say it up to the creationist to figure out how to model the evolutionists own proposed system, mathematically, and prove that it doesn’t work.
Well done, Günter Bechly! I will see you someday! Until then, you will be missed!