I’m not sure why you cited Da Cuhna earlier then, if their data was too incomplete. You linked a non-peer-reviewed preprint, I will be interested to see how the final paper looks. It does indeed include more data which is certainly valuable. I look forward to seeing how researchers like Williams and Ettema comment on it. Assuming there are no problems with the analysis then this could at least muddy the waters, where currently it seemed there was a clear view of the 2D tree.