Is Biblical Scholarship Crawling with "Unscientific" Piety?

It wasn’t your error, you believed Meyer’s lie and completely ignored my (and @Art’s) spoonfeeding the truth to you more than once.

It wasn’t limited to that. You even parroted another of Meyer’s lies:

Slipping the conditional in there is dishonest, because it was a gross misrepresentation of the hypothesis and its predictions that RNA still does, not merely can in the lab, perform essential biological functions. Nowhere in Meyer’s vile chapter was that mentioned. Meyer’s lies are interlocking and fooled you completely.

And you still haven’t withdrawn that false claim.

Not the other falsehoods you based on it.

You haven’t withdrawn your recommendation of Meyer as a summary of abiogenesis research.

Just as dishonestly, you based repeated claims that I was “caviling” on the same falsehood. You did not withdraw them.

Why hasn’t Meyer, whom you shamelessly tout as a scholar, corrected his false claims published in 2009?

Why haven’t Dembski and Wells corrected the same false claim?