How much is enough? This seems to be an entirely arbitrary criteria.
It is strange that someone thinks descent with modification is a problem for a theory that is based on descent with modification. What next? The observation of length and time contraction are problems for relativity?
How would this produce evidence for separate origins of two species groups billions of years ago? You need to supply positive evidence for your claims of design, not simply pick at someone elseâs theories. Focus on your positive claims and provide evidence for them.
The functional information inside DNA to start. Your next move is to say that is not evidence and so we stalemate. Just avoiding an endless loop of exchanges.
Why are you asking questions you already know the answer to? Where is the detailed step by step process how the atomic components of gravity curves space time? Letâs just agree to disagree and not go 20 rounds of nonsense exchange.
On another forum there was a poster, AFDave Hawkins, who was such a caricature of a Creationist he has a series of Internet âLawsâ named after him. One standard was
Second Law: One may escape intellectual responsibility on any issue merely by stating an intent to pursue it.
How would you explain conservation through deep time if not by assuming that any change that would have occurred within the conserved part of a protein would have been eliminated by negative selection ? Just curious.