They specified their model with enough clarity that we can say with confidence it is conflict with the genetic evidence. Of course, it is in conflict with quite a bit more, but we can scope it there for now. I’d start by pointing out that it requires/predicts mutation rates nearly 2order of magnitude greater than obsered.
My claim is that de novo creation of Adam and Eve can be consistent with science, and I’ve demonstrated this with evidence. You are free to disagree. Simply asserting your disagreement is not adding any new information to the conversation.
Just let it go.
@Michael_Okoko I’ve made my point. You disagree, and I’m fine with that. This conversation has run its course. Thanks for participating.