I’ve read most of the posts in this thread, but I’m curious how you would answer the question. What would your summary be?
I think I would summarize it as “it’s complicated”. Of course, in an open internet forum that welcomes diverse viewpoints, it’s nearly impossible to say anything definitive about Peaceful Science.
I would generally say that many people on PS are skeptical about the strength of evidence for God’s existence that could come from science. I don’t think that means they are against scientific arguments, per se, but rather that they may want to distinguish between scientific hypotheses and arguments using scientific data. They will also likely want to be careful about “good” vs “bad” scientific arguments.