Is the Wikipedia page on Intelligent Design biased?

[colewd (Bill Cole)]

@Tim

But also “no”, I am not in the least bit interested in going on that digression. Speaking for myself, it is sufficiently self-evident that ID is pseudoscience that I am not interested in going down this rabbit-hole. If you are genuinely ignorant as to why ID is widely regarded as pseudoscience, then I would suggest that you read some of the approximately 4000 scholarly articles that discuss ID and pseudoscience.

Hi Tim
Yet one of our best and brightest cannot support the claim as the claim is political rhetoric. This is just the first sentence of the article I would be embarrassed for the 4000 scholars you cited.

The claim that maybe pseudo science is universal common descent. See @Argon diagram.I have yet to see a test based on the scientific method that reproduction can create thousands of genes.