Well, let’s see. You start by pointing to observations that according to you indicate the reality in the distant past of an RNA world. Then you point to the Ronin Ohno hypothesis, not realizing that it refutes the RNA world hypothesis. What all this mean is that the naturalistic scenarios that have been put forward to explain the genetic code and the translation system are highly speculative, based on observations that might appear to be suggestive but certainly not indicative of anything. The first truth is that under naturalism, the origin of the genetic code is an enduring mystery. The second truth is that asserting, like @Puck_Mendelssohn do, that we know that no intelligence was involved in the genetic code is a gross epistemological error.