Wow! I’m impressed at your ability to twist a response and claim it shows something it does not show in any way, shape, or form!
Here Rumraket: Response to Dr. Tour on Abiogenesis - #32 by Rumraket you assert that James Tour’s accomplishments are irrelevant and he is using arguments from ignorance. Wow again!
So why are you on this thread? Would you like to understand why people have doubts about naturalist origins?