I didn’t present that argument. Specifically, I didn’t say “therefore evolution”, or anything equivalent. I said there was no evidence of any process other than evolution having taken place.
You are substantiating that by not producing any such evidence, and I am substantiating it by noting that your posts (and other ID writings) are devoid of any evidence for a design process.
In fact, not only are your posts devoid of any evidence for a design process, they’re also devoid of any of the details necessary to identify, evaluate or validate any evidence. You don’t know what was designed, when it was designed, how it was designed (or manufactured), and you refuse to say who the designer is.
You started this thread by claiming you had “evidence for the activity of a designing intelligence”. I don’t need to make a positive argument for evolution in response, I only need to poke holes in your arguments - which I’ve done so successfully that you’ve given up trying to defend them.
