Puck made excuses for buying Neil Thomas’s book from Discovery Institute Press.
I was not blaming Puck for that – he does us all a favor by actually reading the book, and reporting here on it.
Puck also wrote
I wonder whether Thomas’s book is quite that bad. His arguments against “Darwinism” are pathetic, but he does have a lot of other material about the Victorians being intellectually ready for Darwin’s message. That part struck me as roughly correct (when I heard about it in interviews with him). But it is not as new as he implies. Is that part painful too?