Thank You, glad you enjoyed it.
Now this is an interesting question to ponder as it gets to the source of a lot of philosophically interesting conversations about how much our “pictures” color our understanding of the world. When do we push these “pictures” too far? How much do the pictures blind us to other information that may be helpful in our understandings of the world? Are certain “pictures” more central to others? Is it even possible to take multiple “pictures” seriously?
I agree that this seems to be the standard talking points you run into at least in the popular literature. Have you @Jordan ever seen the reverse or somebody successfully mix the two “pictures” of ‘design’ versus ‘creative creatures/co-creation’? Are these “pictures” part of the problem in coming to terms between the two camps?
Amen