You left out the most important part of his post, Eddie:
Neil does not propose an “Intelligent Design cosmology” that is somehow supposed to vanquish the supposedly atheistic or vastly unsupported cosmology model. He is honest about his limitations. Thus his behavior is vastly different from, and vastly more humble than, the behavior of those who have attacked consensus biology on this forum.
Nor does Neil tell us the nature of his doubts. His view might be that no cosmology could be satisfactory without reconciling quantum mechanics with relativity. And that is an opinion shared widely by cosmologists themselves!
Best,
Chris