On Euthyphro

[structureoftruth (Matthew Dickau)]

@Faizal_Ali

Seriously? So you think the belief that 2+2=4 is as widely accepted and as difficult to argue against as is the belief that boys should all be circumcised? On what grounds can you possibly assert that the belief in the morality of compulsory circumcision is properly basic?

I’m going to call faulty generalization on this. There are rational intuitions much weaker than 2+2=4, and moral intuitions much stronger than the propriety of circumcision.

@Faizal_Ali

This is where your argument runs into trouble right out of the box.

Then by all means, let me know where I went wrong. Though, I think a further defense of premise 0 in this thread may be straying off topic.