Perspectives on Discussion of Science and Religion

[Faizal_Ali]

@theaz101

However, since science can’t examine the supernatural, I don’t worry about such an effort.

That is not correct. Science can, and has, examined the supernatural. For instance:

Intercessory Prayer for the alleviation of ill health | Cochrane

@Don_Mc

But as I argue at some length in the book, at the core of what Darwin called “one long argument” appears to be a fallacy of composition, which remains (at least implicitly) at the core of most evolutionary explanations for functionally complex systems to this day.

Please elaborate on what you believe is the fallacy of composition committed by Darwin and every other evolutionary biologist that has come after him for the past century and a half. TBH, I am highly skeptical that such an error could have been committed for that long with no one but you noticing.