Perspectives on Discussion of Science and Religion

[Rumraket (Mikkel R.)]

@Don_Mc

Years later I read where Ken Miller responded to Michael Behe’s argument from irreducible complexity by saying, “Darwin’s answer, in essence, was that evolution produces complex organs in a series of fully functional intermediate stages,” and adding, “If each of the intermediate stages can be favored by natural selection, then so can the whole pathway.” But that doesn’t follow.

Yes it does. I have personally explained to you how. You liked my post, but never responded to it.

I consider your not modifying your case in light of correction to be an act of dishonesty.

You should completely stop giving the argument you are giving here if you’re not going to also give my rebuttal to it. I’m serious. If you give that argument again anywhere, or to anyone, in the rest of your life, without also giving the rebuttals to it you have received from me or others, then you are a dishonest person because you’re knowingly holding back information that contradicts your claim.