Yes.
Or do you think one needs a lab to remove peacock feathers?
You spin a very tangled web of deceit to support your need to express contempt for others, Eddie.
Given the false claim preceding this, what is apparent to you is not linked to reality.
You left off the hypothesizing and predicting parts. Don’t those involve thinking too, and aren’t those types of thinking completely missing from ID, as well as your own thinking?
What’s amazing is that you can’t acknowledge this defect in IDcreationist thinking. To test a hypothesis by doing something in the lab or in the field, you have to think of both the hypothesis and the empirical test.
IDcreationism, at its root, is a failure of thought. Its proponents fail to think of anything they can do.
This is hilarious. As noted above, it’s not a dichotomy between thinking and doing, as you are falsely portraying it here, but the failure of IDcreationists to think of anything for themselves or anyone else to do. This is most amusing when the DI tries to spin a newly published paper as supporting ID–the first question I have is, then why didn’t anyone at the DI think of doing those experiments, or at least suggesting that someone else do them? It’s all retrospective; there’s zero courage for hypothesis testing.
And here we have Eddie’s caste system again. The Dalit technicians are just somehow unthinkingly “discovering new data” for the Brahmins to analyze. No hypothesis formulation (thinking) or testing (thinking + doing) ever!