What does “action” even mean in that sentence? What does “real” mean? Do you have any idea? Yes, it makes no sense to me, or rather it appears to mean nothing.
Sure, that goes along with omniscience. But how is that relevant?
This also appears to mean nothing. Perhaps we’ve been through this before? I’ve had several conversations attempting to find out what “providential” means, and they’ve never managed to come to anything, just like the present conversation.
Not analogous. It would be analogous if someone had murdered the deceased for the purpose of bringing the family together. In that case I suppose they might be glad to be together but they most certainly would not be thanking the murderer for it.
Please don’t try to equate us.
And yet you can have no knowledge that any of these things happened. They’re certainly subtle enough that we could not distinguish them from complete lack of action. Of course it’s logically possible, but it reminds me of all the people who claim that the Egyptians must have had help from aliens to build the pyramids, because they weren’t techologically advanced enough to do it themselves. It takes away credit from those actually involved.
Don’t you see yourself making excuses here?