I moved @Nesslig20 's comment to create a new topic because I felt it deserved more attention than it was likely to get buried deep in another discussion. Use the link below to see the replied-to comment in the original context.
I’m missing the why. You state a number of facts, none of which imply a creator at all.
Please complete your argument, so far you seem to have only stated a few premises none of which entail (or make likely) the conclusion you claim to derive from them.
I’m comparing the facts that I stated with a basic premise of creationism vs naturalistic OOL.
Creation’s premise is “all parts were formed at the same time”.
Naturalistic OOL’s premise is a “bottom-up” process. Precursors of nucleotides > nucleotides > polymers of nucleotides > non-enzymatic replication of polymers and so on. RNA World was hypothesized since RNA can act as both storage and as an enzyme.
Peptidyl transferase is supposedly strong evidence for RNA World, but when you take a look at how it is produced today (the facts that I listed), it is firmly within DNA World. Since I think that Peptidyl transferase fails as evidence for RNA World, I think that it, as well as all other integrated processes like DNA replicati…
1 Like