Nothing. I just understand that the context your quotes are lifted out of. I have even explained it to you at length:
The quotes are demonstrably taken out of context as shown by Gould’s testimony in the Arkansas 1980 creationism trials, and they being used to support a case that they do not support.
You are once again confusing a dispute between phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium, as if it supports the claim that there are no transitional fossils, and that the fossil record does not support common descent.
Both those claims are false. There are transitional fossils and Gould thinks so, and the fossil record supports common descent.
The fossil record can support common descent without supporting phyletic gradualism, and transitional fossils can be rare without being non-existent.
Once again, there was a dispute regarding which of multiple theories of evolution the fossil record supported. Gould and his colleagues were criticizing a particular hypothesis called phyletic gradualism, and posited a competing hypothesis they called punctuated equilibrium. They claimed that under certain conceptions of the phyletic gradualism hypothesis, the fossil record could not support it. They still thought the fossil record supported gradual evolutionary change.
There isn’t any amount of quotes you can bring from Gould and colleagues criticizing phyletic gradualism that will magically make evidence supporting evolution from the fossil record go away. And they still thought the fossil record supported gradual evolutionary change, even though they claimed it did not support phyletic gradualism. They gave multiple concrete examples of gradual evolutionary change exhibited by the fossil record.