But you didn’t leave it. You went on to reiterate your lack of understanding of the ad hominem fallacy. Do you typically contradict yourself in consecutive sentences?
Here’s an example of ad hominem:
Addressed to me. Moreover, it’s a twofer: your ad hominem fallacy was based on a blatant lie.
The former, not the latter. Analogies are explanatory devices. Your use of the Hoyle analogy tells me that you don’t understand that natural selection is nonrandom.