It is such an outlandish claim; may I suggest you ask the person who made the claim what evidence he has for it? Apart from any credible evidence offered by him, I’d make a guess that he wishes to dismiss valid points against his own views while having no arguments to support his own views, nor arguments against his opponent’s. Name calling is often the resort of one having no rational points to make.
Or maybe he’d weasel out of the claim by suggesting that the meaning of plurality of he intended was 3. in the list below,
-
the excess of votes received by the leading candidate, in an election in which there are three or more candidates, over those received by the next candidate ( majority ).
-
more than half of the whole; the majority.
-
a number greater than one.
-
fact of being numerous.
-
a large number; multitude.
-
state or fact of being plural.
I will concede that there may be 2 Americans that would be okay with being led by a white supremacist. If that was all that @Faizal_Ali meant I’d have to give him that. But then I’d take issue with whether Trump is one. And of course Trump is one, as much as Charlamagne ain’t black. https://youtu.be/_0H0qBBkRe4?si=ERNru7stk8Q4jlog
Do you ever even ponder why, in a venue where people actually listen to one another and at the same time feel free to challenge vacuous comments, (even if offered by one on “their team”) a post including, “Why would anyone want a plurality of Americans to be okay with being led by a white supremacist?” could jive with,
“Harris appears to have won 80 percent of the Black vote, according to an exit poll by The Associated Press.
But that’s a drop of 10 percentage points compared with 2020 when the current president, Joe Biden, won nine of 10 Black votes.”
Might these Black voters also be,
Does this accidentally get past the moderators or is that now,