Gotta love that ID model of engagement. First refuse any form of open discourse, then complain when others openly discuss ID claims. I offered to set up some sort of “visiting scholar” discussion, but he didn’t mention that.
Well then who he is willing to talk to, if not the people most knowledgeable about ID? Maybe he should go to UD where anyone doubting ID gets banned, and he can bask in the glowing appreciation of no criticism at all.
Also, it looks to me that he still didn’t define any terms which would allow his challenge to be met, as predicted by @structureoftruth: