Swamidass is Inescapably a Philosophical Naturalist

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@AJRoberts

Another distinction that needs to be made is that a scientist who is committed to MdN in their scientific work but who is not a PhNist can rationally, logically, reasonably, and justifiably reach conclusions that suggest God has been, and indeed still is, at work in the Universe. His work can be indicated by, just not proven or shown through, scientific evidences. Science cannot prove God’s existence or work. (But paradoxically science works because of God’s established order in nature.)

Thanks @AJRoberts, that is very close to my position. I’m looking forward to your article coming out on this. Coming from you at RTB, that is very significant. I am hopeful it will guide others to follow The Rules of the Game.

@AJRoberts

I think there is a lot of conflation when it comes to understanding and discussing the differences between methodological (MdN) and philosophical naturalism (PhN).

No kidding. Thanks for the sane voice here.

@AJRoberts

A rational scientist (or person) should never be limited to consider only the scientifically verifiable as an individual making arguments to the best explanation. Many things are rational without being particularly scientific.

Amen. (wait, are scientists allowed to say that? )