You stated:
The clear implication here is that, as you are “mak[ing] [your] case” here, you are claiming to “know the basics of quantum physics” and have “read enough about it online” to do so.
The problem here is that all physics has its basis in applied mathematics – and this includes quantum physics.
The “basics” of all physics is math – and this again includes quantum physics.
If you don’t understand the math, then you cannot “know the basics of quantum physics”.
This has meant that far from successfully “mak[ing] [your] case”, what you have in fact done is convince everybody (with the possible exception of a few like the already-known-to-be-mathematically-challenged @colewd) that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
The math is particularly important in determining if quantum effects can be stretched sufficiently far as to justify ORCH-OR’s claims – questions over which appearing to be one of the major criticisms of ORCH-OR.