The Argument Clinic

[Tim]

@Meerkat_SK5

Well duh, nobody I have encountered here is a quantum biologist or neuroscientist or quantum physicist

@Tim stares at @Meerkat_SK5.

Do you have any understanding how stupid, rude and ignorant that statement is?

The aphorism “those who live in glass houses should not throw stones” doesn’t even touch on the TOWERING HYPOCRISY that statement betrays.

You @Meerkat_SK5 have no expertise whatsoever in either quantum biology or neuroscience or quantum physics – in fact you have demonstrated that you have no competence whatsoever in either science or logic.

This brings me back to a series of unanswered questions that I have put to you multiple times:

@Tim

I therefore have three questions for you:

1. What is your formal background in physics?
2. What is your formal background in calculus?
3. What books/textbooks on quantum physics, written by actual quantum physicists have you read? (As opposed to Youtube videos by apologists.)

To which I would add:

4. What is your formal background in biology?
5. What books/textbooks on quantum biology, written by actual quantum biologists have you read?
6. What books/textbooks on neuroscience, written by actual neuroscientists have you read?

I am afraid it is well past time to INSIST on answers to these questions, given your all-too-frequent aspersions on others’ expertise.

@Meerkat_SK5

You can say the same thing for Darwin and the modern scientists today who advocate for it.

Again you are betraying your basic ignorance of how science actually works. Modern scientists do not try to build Darwin’s original ideas, contained in The Origin of Species into their work – they build build modern biological concepts, that derive from Darwin, and thousands of other biologists, that have been repeatedly tested and refined, into their work.

@Meerkat_SK5

However, in cases where there are strong metaphysical and religious implications and undertones like Darwinian evolution and String theory, I don’t think anyone should give them the benefit of the doubt.

That tired, worn-out canard is easily disproven by the existence of millions of devout Christians, many of them scientists (which you are not), many of them biologists (which you are not) that accept evolution.

Your rejection of evolution can better be attributed to your profound ignorance of science and your pig-headed acceptance of an overly-narrow interpretation of the Bible.

@Meerkat_SK5

For example, As Fuz Rana suggested …

What possible reason would I have for giving a rat’s arse what Fuzzy Rana “suggested”? Fazale Rana has no expertise in either Biology or History of Science.

Further, his organisation, Reasons to Believe Bloviate, has no scientific credibility whatsoever – it is simply a bunch of dishonest apologists – “Liars for Jesus” in the popular vernacular.

When you state “Fuz Rana suggested …” you may as well state:

Bozzo the clown suggested …

… or …

I, @Meerkat_SK5, am so ignorant that I don’t know a good source from a credibility-free source.

@Meerkat_SK5

I have already explain why there is no evidence.

Given that your ‘explanations’ are based upon the same ignorance of science and ignorance of basic logic, as the rest of your sewer-main of excrement, I have no doubt that it was a worthless as everything else you have written.

@Meerkat_SK5

The burden of proof is on you guys now to actually produce this evidence.

Putting up with you is quite burdensome all on its own.

To the extent that any burden falls upon us (which I am quite sure it *doesn’t), it can easily be met simply by posting this Google search:

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q="common+descent"+evidence

For now, I am whole-heartedly tired of your persistent, insistent, willful ignorance – so I will leave you to spout your incoherent and all-too-frequently-plagiarised balderdash at other on this unfortunate thread.