The Big Picture on ID and this Forum

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@Nonlin.org

I do not report to the “principles” - don’t you mean ‘principals’?

That is right, thanks .

@Nonlin.org

I am an independent thinker plenty educated and with working experience in many of the fields discussed.

None of this is verifiable or visible. For this to mean anything you have to unmask yourself. Until then, it means nothing.

@Nonlin.org

My views are at times different than those of ID proponents (as in “microevolution”, “irreducible complexity”, “specified complexity”).

Couldn’t tell at all from what you write. Why not go argue with them about what you disagree with?

@Nonlin.org

I am not so much arguing in favor of ID as I am arguing against the pseudoscience of Darwinist “evolution” (including its ‘neo’ and ‘neo’s neo’) and only with logic, observational, and in general scientific arguments.

Darwinism has already been falsified. You missed the party by about 60 years. You will enjoy reading up on Haldane and Kimura’s work.

@Nonlin.org

Sorry to say this, but if you’re incapable of winning a scientific argument, you will have to ban me in an admission of defeat as did Biologos.

I’m not trying to win a scientific argument with you.

No one in science cares who “wins” on forums in the internet with anonymous polemicists. I’m not engaging your arguments.