This more related to the demarkation issue and methodological naturalism. It comes up in pseudoscience, because a common recourse is to violate the original rationale of MN, violating Bacon’s warning against the Idol of Superstition.
I put this in a new thread, too, because I think this is a key theological point that deserves its own look. This is also the primary point of discord between you and I (though we agree on a large number of things). In the end, we do not have to agree, but this is an opportunity to understand my point.
If I am right, this is very significant. Your rhetoric is not going to work in a scientific context. However, my rhetoric does. If there is good motivation for it, and I think there is, that gives you a way forward with the things you really care about. You could really win.