Is a mechanism that translates code evidence of design? We simply need to observe something where design detection is clear.
Is what we are observing in biology more like the face or more like the other parts of the mountain?
I am interested in distribution of particular kinds of sequences across taxonomic groups
These are fair questions… and I have observed the back-and-forth discussions over them for many months now. There is nothing that I have seen more than claims and denials, but no evidence.
So, what if design detection is not clear? What if, as in my comment above, there is no difference between how the process itself works and how God might intervene to push some aspect along at a certain point in time? What if the process was set into motion in such a way that certain results were guaranteed? What if the answer is that there is no answer?
The face, in this case, is the sum of both natural activities and manual activities. The face is non-existent without both. With the natural aging of the rock, we have a forehead and chin that would never be identified as such without the nose, cheek and eye added later.
With biology, maybe we cannot know, because the method used to modify a species is the same method regardless of the source of the action. So, the question as to which parts of the mountain are more like biology may not be a valid question.
Additionally, one could argue for a foreknowing “providentialism” that, unbeknownst to the sculptor(s), shaped their final product into just such the “fifth face” enigma we see today. When the workers began blasting at the rock face, it quickly became apparent that the area to Washington’s right was inferior rock for carving… and yet, Jefferson was originally planned to appear to Washington’s right. Had he done so, the “fifth man’s” outline and features would have been much less compelling, visually. Now, who can we blame for placing inferior rock quality in exactly that location?
Before anyone goes apoplectic over the seeming inanity of this line of thinking, let me remind you that this is merely an analogy that @swamidass found interesting, as do I, but such speculations are not strictly “scientific,” per se… nor are they thereby “inane.” They just are interesting and illustrative (possibly instructive) of the kinds of whimsical means at God’s disposal…
2 Likes
How do you know this is true?
How do I know that “maybe we cannot know something” conclusively? I don’t know.
Possibly my comma misuse threw you off? It would have been more clear if I had said:
With biology, maybe we cannot know because the method used to modify a species is the same method regardless of the source of the action.
1 Like
What does “kinds of sequences” mean?
2 Likes
Agreed. This is a variation wherein the some kind of prior knowledge, and meddling led to the final result. At any rate, it is impossible to be able to know this for certain.
We know that life on earth is dependent upon a moon like ours with all of its peculiarities. A rogue planet had to hit the earth at just an angle, with specific momentum, in order to eject the heavy atmosphere and result in the moon. That could have happened “randomly” or it could have been orchestrated… if it were so, we’re not going to see any signs of the planet being launched toward the earth just so. We are merely left to wonder how it occurred, as in was it caused or random.
This is a claim that the method to modify species is known. How would you support that claim?
Do you disagree that species are a product of their genetic makeup?
But I think you are reading far too much into what I’m saying anyhow.
In part yes they are a product of their genetic make up but I know of an exception so there are probably more.
Fair enough 
so you dont see design here?:
(image from wiki).
1 Like
If you look at a spectrum of low to high design detectability this would be closer to high detectability then the cheese sandwich. 
Bet you don’t.
Rejecting options based not on evidence but solely on your gut feel will take you nowhere in science. That’s one reason why ID holds the zero credibility position in science it does, my friend.
1 Like
You’re twisting that rather badly. I asked you why IDers weren’t looking at all for physical signs of manufacture. You came back with the why bother looking for a factory on the sea floor and I merely asked how you could rule out a factory when you have zero evidence at all. I can easily hypothesize space aliens with a factory ship full of super CRISPR technology parked on the sea floor churning out those Cambrian trilobites. No one asked you to defend the “factory” hypothetical. Asking you tough questions seems to be a trigger with you for some reason.
BTW I’m still waiting for you to explain how a pattern in a genome or genomes can tell you when, where, and how the genome was manufactured as you claimed here.
Again that is nothing personal, just asking to explain and/or defend what you asserted.
1 Like
It appears to me you are trying to build straw-men. It would serve you well to understand the ID argument first.
Ok. I’ll bite. What men of straw am I erecting?
1 Like
What in the world??!! What is your exception??
1 Like