The statement doesn’t make me anything. It just describes the relationship between evidence and belief in theism. I think the evidence(meaning just observations of various facts about the universe) isn’t good enough to compel theism over and above alternative explanations for those same facts. For that reason it can’t be said to be evidence for theism. Not even weakly, as that would require it to be favoring theism even slightly. I don’t think it does.
I don’t. It isn’t.
Do I need to do that to be an atheist? Try to recognize that some times we just don’t have good evidence for the answers we can give to the questions we ask, even if we have a desire to know them. And I’m not sure the world really is the result of an “event”, whether planned or not. For all I know time could stretch infinitely and endlessly into the past.