Has your hero Meyer ever addressed the fact, published 20 years ago, that the ribosome is a ribozyme? That this was predicted by the RNA World hypothesis? Why did he deny this empirical fact in his book, which has a chapter allegedly devoted to the RNA World hypothesis, if there’s any ID post hoc explanation of it?
It’s not a ribozyme. The PTC is RNA, but the whole structure is RNA plus a LOT of proteins.
The further mention of the conversation of Church, Venter, and Shapiro doesn’t correct this erroneous assertion, and neither does the additional detail about the workings of ribosomes. And none of this answer’s @Mercer‘s question.
No matter - I think we are coming around to agreement on this. If someone can help Meyer update his book(s), that may be a good thing.