I’d go there. When in one context the author states the paper was really about Genetic Entropy, and in the paper itself that is not mentioned in any way whatsoever, instead the presentation being as some medically relevant investigation of influenza, I am inclined to take that as a calculated misrepresentation.
1 Like
Pity you chose to ignore and run from the genetic evidence. Instead of honestly dealing with what was presented you chose to create a ruckus as a distraction to cover your inability to answer simple questions. Sadly that’s a tactic you employ all too frequently.
I will thank you for another wonderful demonstration of what passes for intellectual honesty in some YEC circles.
2 Likes
I don’t feel that I have slung any mud. I would opine that:
…constitutes true mudslinging.
I really don’t see how my pointing out that the continued existence of influenza A H1N1 subtype in 2019 completely invalidates C&S’s 2012 conclusion of “apparent” extinction, and therefore support of GE, constitutes mudslinging.
I’ve been quite careful to stick to matters of objective fact and avoid matters of interpretation.
1 Like
Agreed @PDPrice.
1 Like