It is problematical to the extent that it gives credibility to ID arguments that evolution is too improbable to have occurred without divine assistance. I have in fact seen one ID advocate on this forum repeatedly cite Kojonen for cover when the opinion of more critical observers of ID have been raised.
I think the general level of detachment from science (commented upon by both you and @Mercer) rather undercuts any credibility this line of argument can have in being connected to the relationship between Religion and Science. However, given that Kojonen is a Theology Post-Doc, this level of detachment is perhaps understandable.
It is also of course possible (though I don’t think probable) that Kojonen’s book, The Compatibility of Evolution and Design, contains more scientific grounding for his claims, that were omitted for brevity from Glass’s summary.