“Quantum mind” is not a scientific theory. Per Wikipedia, it is merely a “group of hypotheses”.
As you have no background in quantum physics, nor have you demonstrated any understanding of the field, you are not competent to determine whether it has been “very well tested”, nor are your cherry-picked citations from these hypotheses’ cheerleaders in any way probative.
This conclusion is a non sequitor, in that it does not follow from the quantum mind hypotheses (even if, for the sake of argument, we accept these hypotheses) combined with your fine-tuning constants. This is especially true when we look at the claims you make about your “universal protoconsciousness”:
You are therefore effectively claiming that your “universal proto-consciousness” is (the Abrahamic conception of) God.
Thus, you are claiming that physics proves the existence of God.
Even from somebody with a PhD, or even a Nobel Prize, in Physics, this would be an absurdly grandiloquent claim. Coming from somebody with no demonstrated background or competence in the field whatsoever, it is quite simply ridiculous.
As @AllenWitmerMiller said on another thread, you have reached the “Byers’ Point™”: