Why are We Disagreeing with ID?

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@lee_merrill

@swamidass

Perhaps we are all wrong. But how exactly would that have happened? How do you make sense of this?

I think there is a commitment to some form of methodological naturalism, therefore any possibility is preferable to design. Does anyone here want to continue to defend Dawkin’s program? No one disputes that evolution can climb a completely selectable hill, and making it out that all of evolution is like this is unreasonable. I respectfully submit to you that Dawkins is wrong.

That’s not the right diagnosis, at least not for me.

I think God designed it all, and Its implausible I am predisposed against a conclusion I already hold. And I am not defending Dawkins. He really has little to do with this. Maybe Dawkins is wrong, and so is Behe.