Given your reliance on Apologists in general, and your heavy reliance on RTB in particular, I find this quibbling more than a little ludicrous. Hugh Ross has no qualification or experience even remotely relevant to biology. And the relevance of even Fazale Rana background (“… a PhD in chemistry with an emphasis in biochemistry from Ohio University. He later pursued postdoctoral studies in the biophysics of cell membranes.”) would appear tenuous at best.
Does Michael Jones of ‘Inspiring Philosophy’ have any academic background in QM? I rather doubt it (and his webpage certainly doesn’t mention any).