And this has caused you to garble things yet again.
In a previous thread you stated (or rather restated) that:
This statement seemed incoherent to us at the time.
Having now skimmed Nelson’s original chapter, I can tell you that he DID NOT talk about dynamic basic types. Rather he was talking about his creation model being dynamic:
Rather, one will find extended discussions of what I will term dynamic theories of creation – as represented, for instance, by figure 32.2.
This again shows why you should not use secondary sources!