She definitely is. That’s not at all what she claims to be like.
By accusing us of acting in bad faith?
By accusing us of filtering evidence while she simply filters out all evidence in favor of hearsay she likes?
In your opinion, was she acting honestly when she wrote this in the dialog occurring simultaneously?
That’s not what someone even trying to keep her eyes wide open thinks.
She’s been cut plenty of slack.
Was the paragraph quoted above written by someone who thinks she needs help?
Is there something to be gained by avoiding the evidence while claiming to be interested in it? Is pointing someone to the evidence kind? Is pointing out afterward that someone isn’t looking at the evidence kind or unkind?
This. At the level of taking scientific action, they are obviously aware that their hypothesis is not worth testing. However, doing cargo cult science brings in the $ and helps tamp down the massive cognitive dissonance they must be experiencing.
And it is true that actions (or in this case, the lack thereof) speak more loudly than all those words they write.