This is noteworthy. Look at this video today by Nathanial Jeanson (Answer in Genesis).
Accusing Joel Duff of Scientific Misconduct?
Peaceful Science and BioLogos
Also of note, the Peaceful Science forum appears at the end of this video. Seems like Dr. Jeanson is a reader (Hi Nathan!). Though we should be clear, I also am not anti-creationist. By the way, thank you for correcting the host and clarifying that I am not with BioLogos.
An Invitation to Dialogue
At 1:13 in, he addresses me. I asked if he would be willing to dialogue with me. He asks why I didn’t not cite him in my book, and asks me to read his work before we dialogue.
Nathaniel Jeanson, thanks for picking up my book. I did actually cite biblical scholarship from AIG, and it was quite helpful to me. I even cited work by Ken Ham positively. I don’t know how you could have missed that.
I didn’t cite your scientific work in my book, because it is just not relevant to my point. The Genealogical Adam and Eve is not an argument for evolutionary science, as you well know. So your work is just not relevant.
And yes, I’ve read both your book, and several of your articles. So I’m caught up on your thoughts, and have a clear explanation of why I disagree. Perhaps you can show me what I misunderstood. Much more likely, you haven’t read what you need to from me. In fact, you’d know I’ve read work work and interacted with it quite a lot.
So, sounds like its a good time for dialogue. If you’d like we can start in private first.